the original primary series: structure, sequencing & intention

The Original Primary Series: Structure, Sequencing, and Intention

We explored the philosophy behind the original method in previous emails. Now let’s look at the practical details of how the Primary Series was first taught and practiced.

The chart below outlines the original order, sequencing, and posture groupings.

1. Opening

Surya Namaskara A

Surya Namaskara B

2. Standing

Padangusthasana

Padahastasana

Trikonasana

Parsvakonasana

Prasarita Padottanasana

Parsvottanasana

3. Seated Foundation

Dandasana

Paschimottanasana A, B, C

Purvottanasana

4. Hip Opening

Ardha Baddha Padma

Triang Mukha Eka Pada

Janu Sirsasana A, B, C

5. Asymmetry and Twisting

Marichyasana A, B, C, D

6. Core

Navasana

7. Deep Hip Opening

Bhujapidasana

Kurmasana

Supta Kurmasana

8. Arm Balance/Integration

Garbha Pindasana

Kukkutasana

9. Integration/Deep Opening

Baddha Konasana

Upavistha Konasana

Supta Konasana

10. Extension

Supta Padangustasana

11. Re-Integration/Stabilty/Backbend

Ubhaya Padangustasana

Urdhva Mukha Paschimottanasana

Setu Bandhasana

12. Standing Balance

Uttitha Hasta Padangustasana

Ardha Baddha Padangustasana

13. Finishing

Paschimottanasana C

Shoulderstand Sequence up to and including Baddha Hasta Sirasana

Final Meditative Postures

Padmasana

Baddha Padmasana

Utplutih

A Few Things to Notice

Changes in the Sequence

A shorter standing sequence ending with Parsvottanasana.

The two standing twists found in the modern sequence were absent.

Uttitha Hasta Padangustasana and Ardha Baddha Padangustasana were moved from the standing sequence and practiced later in the series, following Setu Bandhasana.

Urdhva Dhanurasana was not included.

Setu Bandhasana served as the sole backbend.

Differences in Method

Each asana was held for eight breaths.

Postures were organized into therapeutic groupings, with transitions occurring only after an entire group had been completed rather than between individual postures or sides.

The exception was Group 4, where transitions occurred after the completion of each asana within the grouping.

Longer holds were used in both Sarvangasana (25 breaths) and Sirsasana (50 breaths).

The overall rhythm of the practice was more dynamic.

Breathing slowed significantly during the final three finishing postures, creating a gradual transition into meditation and pranayama.

Taken together, these elements reveal a method that differed substantially from the contemporary Primary Series. In my view, the result was a practice that was both structurally and methodologically distinct from the form most practitioners know today.

The therapeutic grouping of postures, sequence variations, absence of certain asanas, extended inversion holds, and gradual shift from dynamic movement toward meditation suggest a practice designed not only for therapeutic physical effects, but also for energetic regulation and preparation for pranayama and meditation.

This raises an important question:

Have we moved too far from the original intention in the modern method? More importantly, does the older method more accurately reflect the true purpose of yoga?

A Final Reflection

The original method reflected an integrated approach in which sequencing, breath, and grouping worked together to support the therapeutic effects of the series while steadily guiding the practitioner toward meditation. Viewed in this way, Primary Series appears less as a preparatory sequence for more advanced practices and more as a complete system of yoga therapy in its own right.

For me, the old method seems to offer a more effective pathway inward.